Forestville EC项目禁售 发展商承认有“技术问题”

[email protected]
被禁售项目中单位的执行共管公寓“Forestville”发展商，昨天回应市区重建局的“禁售令”，承认这个项目有一些“技术上的问题”，并表示将尝试尽快解决这些问题。 　　这个位于兀兰的执行共管公寓（EC）项目在上周五开始进行抽签活动。不过由于发展商修改项目发展蓝图，却在未获批准的情况下就推出市场，被监管当局通知不准销售，因此造成了项目“推出”而不“销售”的罕有现象。 　　这个项目是由中国发展商皓源投资（Hao Yuan Investment）发展、中冶置地（MCC Land）销售和管理。 　　发展商昨天发布的简短文告说：“发展商皓源投资在此承认，针对Forestville EC项目，确实有一些技术性问题。我们的建筑师正同有关当局密切合作，以尽快解决这技术性问题。我们很遗憾，并毫无保留地对有关各方所造成的不便道歉。”难道还拆了重建？还没开始.在兀兰MRT到处是它的广告，2019年才建好，发展商够倒霉的。老许发话了:
National Development Minister Khaw Boon Wan said Monday that he has directed the Urban Redevelopment Agency (URA) to tighten the rules on the developers of executive condominium (EC) projects to prevent them from profitting off the sale of free space.
Mr Khaw said that he was originally “baffled” that developers were “short-changing” themselves by launching such massive units, as they could have made more money by using the space for two or three normal-sized apartments.
After looking into the matter, he realised that developers were using a loophole in the rules to profit from the super-sized units. Currently, they do not have to pay development charges on outdoor roof terraces, as URA wants to encourage developers to build more communal outdoor space for residents to enjoy.
For example, the presidential penthouse suite at the CityLife @ Tampines project has a roof terrace of 1,600 sq ft, on which the developer did not have to pay development charges.确实，看来确实是这个主要原因。
那个天价的EC就有这个问题：搞大面积、而那部分面积是不用交发展费的。开发商自吃。
前些年，房子基本都没有阳台，因为阳台算面积，要交给国家反展费。后来好像是国家说阳台不收发展费了，霍霍，发展商就拼命盖大阳台：卖给个人可是算面积的。这样赚多啊。（当然，阳台有美观的一面）。当时我就纳闷–咋现在的公寓比以前的漂亮那么多呢？？？赫赫
这次发展商据说是把蓝图中公共的草坪划给一层住户，这样一楼住户面积大了当然价格就上去了。。。
新加坡聪明人太多了。